Archiving

I read an article in this month’s RWA Romance Writers Report magazine about authors keeping documentation of their creative processes: manuscripts, notes, research, etc, and it got me thinking about my own box o’ dabbling. I’m a pack rat by nature, but I’ve been fighting the tendency in the last few years. Moving eight times in the last eight years will have that effect on a person.

When I was a kid, I used to make my own “books” from notebook paper, posterboard, glitter paint, and yarn. The first few pages of a story would be carefully handwritten, though never completed, and I while I kept a few of them, I certainly didn’t keep all of them. I didn’t feel I needed to since most of the stories were thinly veiled replicas of books I’d read, and even then they contained too little actual writing.

Eventually, I progressed to spirals. I still love, love, love spirals. Really. I love them. They’re a catch-all for notes, research tidbits, ideas, character sketches, and the occasional chunk of a manuscript since I handwrite in longhand as a writer’s block remedy. These I’ve kept, often returning to older ones in search of free space to write, resulting in notebooks with monthly or even yearly jumps in stories and ideas.

Whenever I flip through my spirals, I always come across some bit that I don’t remember writing or an interesting idea I’d jotted down but haven’t yet begun. After reading the article in the RWR, I selected one such spiral (also because I plan on writing some today and wanted to begin by handwriting to get the mojo going), and I found a wide range of notes: a story concept, critique notes about a friend’s manuscript, two pages of a back burner story, grammar concepts for potential language creation, a brief character sketch, and some random comment about Canada that I have no idea why I wrote it. I doubt my spirals would make sense to anyone else, especially considering they don’t always make sense even to me, but I’ve enjoyed them.

The best display of my writing evolution, however, is in a manuscript that I began in 1995 and on which I still continue to work from time-to-time. I liken this story to how I learned to crochet. No scarves or baby blankets for me. When I learned to crochet, I decided to start right in with a blanket large enough to cover a queen-sized bed. Needless to say, one edge of the blanket is tight and knotted, but in the eight years it took me to complete, you can see the slow smoothing of my work, the progress from awkward and clumsy to confident and clean. While I won’t say my writing now is even near clean and smooth, I will say that you can see a similar progression in my Story That Never Ends. The dabbling and meandering, the story that shifts like sand and the turns of phrase that clank along like an old engine, all begin to ease and evolve with the plot itself.

My spirals are a glimpse into the workings of my mind, while the STNE is the evolution of my style. I doubt anyone will be interested in either, but I always enjoy the glimpses of the way I used to be.

Links

Here’s a couple of interesting links I stumbled across today.

First, one about sharks and how they’re being overfished to the point of possible extinction.

Second, a page o’links for some of the curiosities of the human body. I especially liked the one on why we love eyes.

That’s it for now. Have a happy day everyone!

Friday Feature: Why Did I Like This Movie?

Did you ever watch a movie that you liked, but you’re not entirely sure why? It’s not really a bad movie, but it’s not good enough to rise above the mediocrity, and yet for some reason you can’t stop thinking about it. The one I’m speaking of in particular is a sci-fi flick called Sunshine.

I know what I did like about it. The sun is dying, and the movie takes place aboard the the Icarus II, a spaceship carrying a huge bomb that the crew plans on sending into the star to reignite it. I don’t know much about astronomy, so okay–I’ll go with that. No problemo. The deal is, they swing around Mercury and realize that the first ship sent out, the Icarus I, is hovering near the sun sending out a distress signal with their bomb still intact. Now, they’d been sent out seven years prior, and everyone on the Icaraus II pretty much agrees that there’s not much of a chance that any of the crew could have survived given the lack of oxygen and food and all. You know, little things like that. A few want to go check it out anyway. They’re current trajectory will take them close enough to the first Icarus that, with a bit of tweaking, they can pass right by. The question: do they want to take the chance?

Now, this is the part I like. The crew recognizes that the fate of the entire world rests on them and this second-chance bomb strapped to their backs. For once, characters in a movie are taking this seriously. There’s no joking around. There’s no lighthearted comments or long drawn-out sob stories about how the people aboard the Icarus I might still be alive and wouldn’t it be giving up their humanity if they didn’t just check? I always hated that argument in movies. Given most circumstances, I’m all for stopping to help others, but I always felt that it detracts from the power of the story when people do that while millions and millions of other people depend on them.

And the Icarus II isn’t a ship out of Star Trek. There’s no quick turns or little stop-overs. The decision to check on the Icarus I could mean death for the crew of the Icarus II in more ways than one, which means death for everyone back on Earth. Of course, for the purposes of the story, they do need to check on the Icarus I, so how does the writer get them there without relying on the tired “But their lives are just as important as the millions upon millions back home”?

Simple. Logic. One of the scientists aboard reminds them all that there’s another bomb strapped to the back of the first Icarus. It’s a second chance in case something’s wrong with the one they have.

Now, I still have issues with this argument. The first being how the heck they’d planned on carting along the second bomb? These aren’t missiles, folks. These bombs are bigger than the freakin’ ship. And that’s if it’s even still operable.

But I could appreciate this argument much more than almost any other, so I was content.

The second part of the story that I really liked is when things started to go wrong. (As things are wont to do in such movies.) The first major error is caused by someone forgetting to take one of the thousands of variables into account. That’s it. He’s so worried about the change he’s required to make in the trajectory, so preoccupied with making sure everything’s right, that they’re heading in the right direction while still being able to complete their mission, that he forgets a detail that jeopardizes them all. How human is that? It’s the first time I really connected with any of the characters because it’s just so simple and honest. These are people under a ton of stress, and one of them f-ed up.

The visuals are stunning. Definite props for that, and the actors are all ones I recognize, though I couldn’t tell you any of their names if my life depended on it. I only know that they’re character actors, though I don’t know why they’re just character actors considering the majority of them have more talent than a lot of the starlets out there now.

Then we get into the “Um, wait. What the hell just happened?” that tips the scale toward the eye rolls and sighs of “Oh, come on!”. I don’t want to give away any major spoilers in case someone strolling along decides s/he wants to watch it, but suffice it to say the plot takes a turn for the pretty ridiculous toward the end. It’s metaphoric, but really–come on.

And despite those beautiful visuals, some of the camera work drives me crazy. The movie uses those little picture-flash effects that interrupt the flow of the story, though not often enough to give me the characteristic motion sickness.

Still, I have to wonder. I liked the movie. Quite a bit. But I’m not completely sure why.

Handwriting

I stumbled upon this story today about the presidential candidates’ signatures and what they say about their personality. Do I believe in graphology? Eh. I’ve studied a bit, as I’m rather fascinated with the idea that someone’s personality could manifest itself in his or her handwriting, and I’ve been told the few times I’ve done in-depth analyzations that I’m surprisingly accurate. Certainly handwriting is individual and dynamic.

Here’s where a scanner would be fabulous because I could use some of my own writing as an example. I know I’ve whined about this before, but hey–I need something in my life to complain about, right?

Despite my lack of visual examples, how about a few quick lessons?

• If the rounded portions of the letters a, d, and o are all closed, then the writer keeps secrets well. If there’s a small opening at the top, s/he’s likes to gossip a bit, but is generally a good secret-keeper.

• “Hooks” in letters, such as at the ends of n, d, and l usually indicate a quick temper, especially if they’re toward the left.

• A left slant to the writing indicates someone who tends to live more in the past, a vertical slant indicates a present-dweller, and a right slant indicates someone who always thinks ahead to the future. The more extreme, regimented, and/or consistent the slant, the more of that trait the writer has.

Make sense? It’s a fun little sideline to study, though what relative purpose it has, I dunno. I just like to dabble. :)

I’m Back!

Hi, everybody!

“Hi, Dr. Nick!” (*Grins* Sorry. Please forgive my temporary Simpson-inspired nerdiness. Like I need more than one type of extreme dorky-ocity. Or whatever.)

Anyway, I apologize for having been away. Day job craziness + family craziness + personal life craziness = poor blogging. But everything’s (sort of) back on track now (*knocks on wood*), so we should be back to our normally scheduled program (*crosses fingers*). At least until late June. And then about a week in July. Then once more in early August…

Here’s where I stand: No major progress made on EITHER of my WIPs.

I know, I know. Commence the flogging. I shall hide my head in shame and live in the shadows of under-achievement, but at least I’m clawing my way back to the land of the living. I have some major catching up to do with my critique partners and my beloved local RWA chapter, and I’m hoping they love me enough to forgive me. (And if not, I have chocolate. Lots and lots of chocolate.)

Today I have “discovered” a new source of entertainment/research: the MSN message boards. Specifically, the “Dating – Heaven and Hell” board. Why do I like this? Well, aside from the obvious single-girl curiosity toward the trials and tribulations of others in the dating realm of doom, I figure it’s good research for romances. So often in our stories, what’s the main conflict between the hero and heroine? Why miscommunication, of course! And what better examples of miscommunication (or lack of communication) than the active daters and/or early relationshipers. *Grins* Behold! I give you the angst of love.

Enjoy!

Friday Feature: From the TBR Pile

Liza Palmer’s Conversations with the Fat Girl reminded me why writing is important. I enjoyed this book tremendously, but I hesitate to say I loved it because I’m still a little too raw. The book hit too close to home in some respects, picking a little at some wounds I’d thought long healed.

Despite the fact that the heroine drove me crazy at times, and the mini jumps back and forth in time tripped me up (though I recognize their necessity in the story), Ms. Palmer wove an underlying truth throughout the book that rang honest and clear. She doesn’t hold anything back, as far as I could tell, but she switched between subtlety and brute honesty in a way that took some of the sting out, using humor and metaphor to make the pill easier to swallow.

What I liked best about the book is the main character’s family. They’re supportive, understanding, and loving throughout, which gives Maggie, the MC, no one but herself to blame for her life. So many books tend to take the easier way out, allowing destructive families to explain away why the heroine falls short of her potential. I’m not saying that there isn’t truth to that storyline, but I felt relieved that it wasn’t so in this book. Maggie’s insecurities are her own.

The one real complaint I have about the novel is how Maggie deals with her childhood best friend, Olivia. Though I understand Ms. Palmer’s decision, I wish Maggie could have taken a slightly higher road on her way to redemption.

But the best part? It’s on page 199, where Maggie and her mother have their first session with a personal trainer, Gabriel.

“Go ahead and give me seven more, Maggie. Gooood, and three, two, and ten more.” I almost drop the bar. Gabriel’s voice is melodic, like an X-ray technician or a doctor as he says, “Relax, this wont hurt a bit.”

“Wait. You said seven more and then you went all the way back up to ten,” I say, raising and lowering the bar.

“You didn’t look tired,” Gabriel says while he leans on the bar itself. The weight I have to lift has now doubled.

“Wait–what? Well, now you’re just leaning on it!” I am horrified.

“Okay, good. Now give me three more.” Now I know that Gabriel is a big, fat leaning-on-the-bar liar. As far as I know, I could be here all night. I do seven more and he finally hooks the bar back into the notch on the equipment.

Mom is next. She does approximately five total. The whole time she looks like she’s in complete pain. Gabriel doesn’t lean on the bar at all and even passes my mother her perfect little water bottle when she’s done. As she’s getting up from the bench, my mother winks at me. The bitch. It’s on.

Oh, so very true and worthy of a warning: Do not drink coffee while reading this book or you make choke while laughing. All in all, I highly recommend it, and it’s taking a place on that special shelf, the one reserved for the meaningful books that take a few years to fully accept.

Ten Rants: Reasons Why I Write

Now, in conjunction with Monday’s Ten Rants, here’s a list of the ten most honest, and not-so-dumb reasons why I do write.

1. The voices in my head start to get crabby if I ignore them too long.

2. You can only crochet so many blankets, scarves, and dog sweaters before people start to hide from you. Ditto with paintings, cupcakes, and CD mixes.

3. Real life and fantasy life start to get mixed up if I don’t have something to refer to later (ie a manuscript of some sort).

4. Patience is a virtue, and nothing teaches it better than having to go over and over and over a manuscript. (And over and over and…)

5. Diligence is a virtue. See above.

6. In order to keep “head cloud” days to a minimum (you know, those days where just can’t keep your head out of the clouds or your mind out of the fog?), I need routine outlets for all that build up.

7. It’s the perfect excuse for reclusive tendencies.

8. When people accuse me of having “no life”, I’ll be able to point at something tangible and go “See that? There’s my life, right there.”

9. I have people-who-shall-remain-nameless who salivate at the thought of failure, and everyone knows that succeeding’s the best way to shut them up. (Though if anyone can find a fail-safe method to make them go away permanently–without resorting to any sort of phyiscal violence and/or creative use of cement–let me know.)

10. I have to. The simplest, most concise, and truly honest answer. I can’t not write.

Besides, Ms. Lexi’s right. No excuses. Thanks, m’dear. :)

Ten Rants: Reasons Why I Don’t Write

Ten of the Dumbest, Most Honest Excuses as to Why I Haven’t Been Writing.
[And What the Sup Has to Say About It]

1. I’m in the halfway slump and worried about the plot choices I’ve made so far. I want to change it, but changing it requires a complete re-write, and I can’t decide whether I should forge ahead and finish before deciding, if I should bite the bullet now and begin making the changes, or if I should start over with a whole new project.

[This is a load of crock, and the real answer's obvious. Finish, Nicole. As La Nora says, "You can't fix a blank page."]

2. I fear the revision process. If I don’t finish, I can’t revise.

[Wait, can you hear that? That faint bock, bock, bgock of an overlarge chicken?]

3. I’m learning more and more about my shortcomings. The more I write, the more I realize just how much I have yet to learn, and the more I begin to second-guess myself.

[But not realizing this means your writing wouldn't improve. Think of this as a good thing. By recognizing where you're weak, you're able to make yourself stronger.]

4. I finally realized that, in order to deepen the character’s POV, I need to deepen my own POV, which means putting more of myself into the stories. That kind of emotional investment is daunting. What if it’s not good enough?

[You're on your own with this one. No one can help you. It's all you, babe. Make the call. You either risk it all or you cash your chips and walk away.]

5. I need mental breaks. After family visits, impending weddings, and new responsibilities at work, I’m fried.

[So the thing that gives is your dream? Why is that? Your dream should be the one thing you cling to when life gets bumpy.]

6. I have too many ideas and not enough time.

[And none of them mean diddly squat if they don't get put down on paper.]

7. Let’s say, miracle of miracles, I publish a book. What then? What if I can never get another one published? Or, worse yet, what if I publish 20 over the next two decades and then run out of story ideas? What if whatever creativity I have inside me shrivels up and dies before I’m ever able to satisfy this hunger?

[And what if you wake up those twenty years from now and realize that you never gave yourself the chance to find out?]

8. I’m like Jane Austen. I can’t write when my life is actively changing. I need quiet, stability, and peace.

[Maybe if you had near the talent Ms. Austen had you could get away with this statement. Besides, life is change, and if you ever have kids, you're screwed.]

9. I’m not good enough.

[And, following your typical pattern, you never think you will be. No excuse.]

10. Watching television, putting in a movie, or reading a book is easier.

[Well, duh.]

The Auditorium

“People! People, can I have your attention, please?”

The babble of voices didn’t die down as laughter, shouts, catcalls, and low conversations littered the air.

The Superintendent tried again, tucking her clipboard under her arm and clapping her hands. “Hey!”

If anything, the noise grew louder.

Red creeping up her neck and into her cheeks, the Sup tucked two fingers into her mouth and let loose a piercing whistle. The hush was immediate, and she nodded once in satisfaction before taking the clipboard back into her hands. “Good. Thank you. Now, if I can have everyone’s attention please.” She paused to allow the last few shuffles of the more belligerent in the group before continuing, “The Landlady wants to do some writing this weekend, and she thinks it’ll help if we get organized now.”

Laughter bubbled through the milling crowd, and even the Sup cracked a smile as she raised her hand to regain the silence. “I know, I know, but I don’t make the rules, I just try to enforce them.” She scanned her clipboard, made a quick notation, and then tucked her pencil through the clip. “Okay, I need everyone to separate by genre. Find your groups!” she called over the ensuing noise of shuffling feet and rumbling complaints.

Read the rest of this entry »

Quickie

Head.

Wall.

Meet and Repeat.

My life in a nutshell.